blending the mix

Icon

A look at the new world of marketing and PR

Is PR really as bad as the cool-cats make out?

I’ve been into the whole “PR people just don’t get it” thing ever since we launched PressRoom a few weeks ago.

We spoke to a room full of PR people who looked (on the whole) utterly confused about things like Twitter, blogging and social media.

“My colleague send press releases out as part of his job, will this social media release tool put him out of a job” was one such comment and typical of the lack of understanding of social media.

On this evidence, the suggestion is that indeed, as per Vero’s post, the PR Industry doesn’t get IT (IT being “it” the object, emphasised for dramatic effect rather than I.T. – that dodgy-looking tech department with long-haired geeks in).

But is it fair to say (frequently) that the PR industry as a whole just doesn’t get it? Look at esteemed luminaries such as Becky, Stephen and Stuart, not forgetting Brian and Geoff – there’s no doubt THEY get it! Why can’t others?

On the flip side, is it fair to suggest that the tech industry (ok, the early adopters) are trying to frighten the PR industry into needing their tech/building services by suggesting that social media requires NASA-affiliated qualifications? Then again we all have a responsibility to ensure that we keep up to date with thing going on in our industry – why should PR be any different?

Take the BIMA and Paul Walsh - no, please do ;-) when looking for a new PR agency, Paul advertised it on Twitter only. If you had to ask why, you were clearly not the people for him.

Is there an element of arrogance from the tech industry that they understand something that they know people need? Let’s not forget, many of these early adopters were the nerdy types at school who got bullied for being nerds, whilst the pretty, popular flirty girlies were the ones who went into PR and Marketing (yes, I know - stereotypes are bad, but sometimes funny!).

Ourman wades in with one of the few negative comments about the piece and makes a good point. Do bloggers have the right to demand more careful treatment just because they have a free-will-powered publishing tool (blog) at their disposal? The suggestion is that bloggers deserve more respect and care taken over their approach than a journalist in getting pitched to. But do they? Yes and No.

No, because they are no different to anybody else writing for an audience. Many bloggers want the exclusive, they need the latest breaking news ahead of anyone else just, like journalists. Why should bloggers take any different exception to a crap pitch than a journo?

Yes, because most blogs (and bloggers) are free from the constraints of corporate policy and can respond vociferously to the lazy pr pitches and can quickly slate the poor approaches for being exactly that – poor. Many hacks would no doubt LOVE the chance to respond in the way bloggers can so PR peeps take note.

And let’s not forget what Chris Anderson did (and he is/was on both sides of the fence!)

Technorati Tags: ,,

Share/Save/Bookmark

As good a presentation on Social Media as I have seen

Marta nails it - looks good AND factual!

UPDATE 7th July: Todd Albertson sent me an email to tell me about his presentation about Vision Caster (from the book of the same name). From the brief run through of the presentation, Todd looks to be getting at the same point as Marta, namely that evangelism through social media can change the world. Now anybody of any shape, size, colour and wealth can in fact influence others if they have the passion to do so. (at least that is what I have taken out of the presentation. Todd, maybe you would like to add something to this is it is not totally correct!)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Neville Hobson - KMP Marketing 2.0 Seminar

Here is a clip of first 10 minutes of Neville’s presentation, discussing how Social Media is shaping the landscape for public relations:


Neville Hobson at KMP’s Marketing 2.0 seminar from paul Fabretti on Vimeo.

I have to say, I have long admired Neville’s blog and the stamina he has shown in producing over 350 editions of FIR. But the way with which he credibly explained much of the often bullshit terminology so often heard when discussing social media was a pleasure - and I am sure was as well received by all the attendees.

This second video is shorter and perhaps more useful to people wanting to get a quick “what do i do next” fix. In it, Neville gives out 8 pointers about how you SHOULD approach Social Media.

NOTE: YOU WILL NEED TO TURN THE SOUND UP!

Enjoy:


Neville Hobson - The 8 rules of social media engagement from paul Fabretti on Vimeo.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Popular Tags

Your comments

  • Craig McGinty: I think if you approach point 2 from the angle of being an editor, an enabler, a provider of ideas...
  • henriette weber: Hi Paul - thanks for adding to the list, both yours and Geoff’s are really great to let people...
  • robin1966: Nice find. Some good points in there, especially about making it simple and not giving a reward each time....
  • Ben: Hi there! I have just got one of these little gadgets…wow I love it!! I think the demo game is rubbish...
  • Sean Howard: Thanks for the link to the ol’ craphammer, Paul. I totally missed the Twitter/Facebook article....